lea_hazel: Typewriter (Basic: Writing)
lea_hazel ([personal profile] lea_hazel) wrote in [community profile] writerstorm 2013-08-15 05:31 am (UTC)

I think it's less prudishness and more itchiness, honestly. Nontheless, an Edwardian undergarment might suit your needs better. It's longer than modern butt-covering underpants, but not particularly voluminous. Under the men's uniforms are meant to be particularly tight, I see no reason why it shouldn't fit just fine.

The Wikipedia articles about underwear are really interesting, too.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting