Date: 2013-08-15 05:31 am (UTC)
lea_hazel: Typewriter (Basic: Writing)
From: [personal profile] lea_hazel
I think it's less prudishness and more itchiness, honestly. Nontheless, an Edwardian undergarment might suit your needs better. It's longer than modern butt-covering underpants, but not particularly voluminous. Under the men's uniforms are meant to be particularly tight, I see no reason why it shouldn't fit just fine.

The Wikipedia articles about underwear are really interesting, too.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
.

Profile

writerstorm: (Default)
Writer Storm - A Brainstorming Community
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags