For those of us writing lengthy prose, I want to pose the question--What do you think about chapters?
I tend to read books straight through, so I don't notice chapters. This, unfortunately, means I have a hard time writing them. I know they serve a purpose, but what? You tell me.
Should they all be approximately the same length in a given work? Why do they exist at all? Should there be internal structure in a chapter? A cliffhanger ending? How do chapters function for readers?
I tend to read books straight through, so I don't notice chapters. This, unfortunately, means I have a hard time writing them. I know they serve a purpose, but what? You tell me.
Should they all be approximately the same length in a given work? Why do they exist at all? Should there be internal structure in a chapter? A cliffhanger ending? How do chapters function for readers?
From:
no subject
What I can't stand are faux-hooks at the end of a chapter that turn out to be quickly resolved at the start of the next chapter For example, She heard a terrifying howl. (end chapter)
(next chapter) She'd stepped on her cat's tail... blah blah
If the story is interesting I'll keep reading it without the Hardy Boys style cliffhangers at the end of each chapter.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
She didn't do it in her earlier works, so my guess would be she decided or was told that she needed to liven up her chapter breaks. It really is annoying. I've seen them in thrillers and in other humorous mysteries, too.
(To avoid username confusion, the original poster is my IRL sister- not me).
From:
no subject
Also: down with faux-cliffhangers! Legitimate cliffhangers are fine. Stepping on your cat's tail to get a "cliffhanger" is silly.